OUCH
:
O
rnstein-
U
hlenbeck models
for phylogenetic
C
omparative hypot
H
eses
About OUCH
Online documentation
OUCH Manual (PDF)
References to the literature
Download OUCH (CRAN)
Related software
refs
Bibliography
M. A. Butler & A. A. King (2004).
`Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution.'
Am. Nat.
164
:683-695.
M. A. Butler, T. W. Schoener, & J. B. Losos (2000).
`The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards.'
Evolution
54
:259-272.
J. Felsenstein (1985).
`Phylogenies and the comparative method.'
Am. Nat.
125
:1-15.
J. Felsenstein (1988).
`Phylogenies and quantitative characters.'
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.
19
:445-471.
T. Garland, A. F. Bennett, & E. L. Rezende (2005).
`Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology.'
J. Exp. Biol.
208
(Pt 16):3015-3035.
A. Grafen (1989).
`The phylogenetic regression.'
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B
326
:119-157.
T. F. Hansen (1997).
`Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation.'
Evolution
51
:1341-1351.
P. H. Harvey & A. Purvis (1991).
`Comparative methods for explaining adaptations.'
Nature
351
:619-624.
J. B. Losos (1990).
`A phylogenetic analysis of character displacement in Caribbean Anolis lizards.'
Evolution
44
:558-569.
E. P. Martins (2000).
`Adaptation and the comparative method.'
Trends Ecol. Evol.
15
:296-299.
M. Pagel (1997).
`Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies.'
Zool. Scr.
26
:331-348.
M. Westoby, M. R. Leishman, & J. M. Lord (1995).
`On misinterpreting nthe phylogenetic correction.'
J. Ecol.
83
:531-534.