Navigation Bar

Aaron King

       Aaron A. King, Ph.D.

      Assistant Professor of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Mathematics
      University of Michigan

Navigation Bar Home

Colleagues
Contact
Curriculum Vitae
Links
Online Exhibit
Publications
Research
Search
Software
Teaching

UM Library
Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis: A Modeling Approach for Adaptive Evolution

Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis: A Modeling Approach for Adaptive Evolution

Marguerite A. Butler and Aaron A. King

The American Naturalist, 164:683-695, 2004.

We have stressed throughout the important role that models of evolutionary change play in our statistical methods. Brownian motion models have been put to use for characterizing change in continuously-varying characters, as has a Markov model in the case of dichotomous characters. New models, based on undoubtedly wicked mathematics, will gradually emerge.   -Harvey and Pagel (1991)

Abstract

 Brownian motion and multiple optimum Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models of adaptive evolution Biologists employ phylogenetic comparative methods to study adaptive evolution. However, none of the popular methods model selection directly. We explain and develop a method based on the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) process, first proposed by Hansen. OU models incorporate both selection and drift and are thus qualitatively different from, and more general than, pure drift models based on Brownian motion. Most importantly, OU models possess selective optima which formalize the notion of adaptive zone. In this paper, we develop the method for one quantitative character, discuss interpretations of its parameters, and provide code implementing the method. Our approach allows us to translate hypotheses regarding adaptation in different selective regimes into explicit models, test the models against data using maximum-likelihood-based model-selection techniques, and infer details of the evolutionary process. We illustrate the method using two worked examples.

Relative to existing approaches, the direct modeling approach we demonstrate allows one to explore more detailed hypotheses and to utilize more of the information content of comparative datasets than existing methods. Moreover, the use of a model selection framework to simultaneously compare a variety of hypotheses advances our ability to assess alternative evolutionary explanations.



For reprints of this paper, contact me at aaron.king@umich.edu
An electronic reprint (PDF) is also available, as is the appendix, containing the technical details.
To download the ouch software package, go to the OUCH homepage.